15% off* everything MagCloud!
Code: 15MAY
Ends May 9, 2024.
*Offer valid through May 9, 2024 (11:59 p.m. local time) with code: 15MAY. Valid for all full-priced printed publications uploaded to and purchased through your own account. A 15% discount is applied toward your product total, excluding any author mark-up, with no minimum or maximum order amount. This offer is good for two uses, and cannot be used for digital publications, combined with volume discounts, custom orders, other promotional codes, or gift cards, or used for adjustments on previous orders.

Save 15% through May 9, 2024. Code: 15MAY Details.

Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship:

Where Did the Names Mahaway and Mahujah Come From? A Response to Colby Townsend’s “Returning to the Sources,” Part 2 of 2

Read Now
  • Details
  • Description
Published by:
Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship
Published:
10/22/2020
Specs:
Digest / 5.25" x 8.25"
68 pages Saddle-stitched
Category:
Religion
Tags:
Book of Moses, church of jesus christ of latter-day saints, Colby Townsend, lds, Mahijah, Mahujah, Mormonism, textual criticism

Review of Colby Townsend, “Returning to the Sources: Integrating Textual Criticism in the Study of Early Mormon Texts and History,” Intermountain West Journal of Religious Studies 10, no. 1 (2019): 55–85.

Abstract: In this Part 2 of a set of articles supporting Colby Townsend’s efforts to raise awareness of the importance of textual criticism, we focus on his argument that Joseph Smith created the Book of Moses names Mahijah and Mahujah after seeing a Bible commentary written by Adam Clarke. We discuss why in this case such a conjecture raises more questions than it answers. We argue that a common ancient source for Mahujah and Mahijah in the Book of Moses and similar names in the Bible and the Book of Giants cannot be ruled out. We reiterate and expand upon arguments we have made elsewhere that the short and fragmentary Book of Giants, a work not discovered until 1948, contains much more dense and generally more pertinent resemblances to Moses 6‒7 than the much longer 1 Enoch.

Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship: Where ...


This site uses cookies. Continuing to use this site without changing your cookie settings means that you consent to those cookies.

Learn more How to turn off cookies
OKAY, GOT IT