Hoffmann Dyer (shirtdimple8)

006), influenced the risk of LW overestimation. Age≥65years, (OR=5.98; CI95%=2.28-15.6; P=.0002), intensive care unit (ICU) stay with ventilation>7days, (OR=0.32; CI95%=0.12-0.85; P=.02) and waist circumference increase (OR=1.02; CI95%=1.00-1.04; P=.04) were factors associated with LW underestimation. Increased waist circumference, age, prolonged ICU stay with ventilation, elevated GGT were associated with an increase in the margin of error in LW prediction. These factors and anthropometric characteristics could help transplant surgeons during the donor-recipient matching process. Increased waist circumference, age, prolonged ICU stay with ventilation, elevated GGT were associated with an increase in the margin of error in LW prediction. These factors and anthropometric characteristics could help transplant surgeons during the donor-recipient matching process.Study tools examining psychological distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping amongst migrants and non-migrants in Australia are very limited. The aim of this research was to assess the psychometric properties and correlation of the English version of Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCSV-19S), and Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) tools during the COVID-19 pandemic situation in Australia. Data from a cross-sectional survey (n = 516) were utilized to examine reliability; 299 (57.9%) were migrants. High internal consistency, as evidenced by Cronbach's alpha, was found for the K-10 (0.92), FCV-19S (0.87) and BRCS (0.66) tools. The corresponding values for migrants and non-migrants were (0.92, 0.87, 0.67) and (0.92, 0.86, 0.63), respectively. Item-total correlations ranged 0.57-0.78 for K-10, 0.62-0.69 for FCV-19S, and 0.39-0.50 for BRCS tools. EFA retained a single factor for each tool with adequate factor loadings. The scoring of K-10 was significantly predicted by the scoring of FCV-19S (r = 0.284, P less then 0.001) and BRCS tool (r = 0.132, P less then 0.01). Therefore, these tools can be used reliably amongst both migrant and non-migrant population in Australia.Telemedicine has been defined as "the use of medical information that is exchanged from one site to another through electronic communication to improve a patient's health" (1). There are several interactions to consider within telemedicine, including clinician-to-clinician, clinician-to-patient, and patient-to-mobile health technology, each of which can provide synchronous or asynchronous care. Traditionally, rheumatologists used telemedicine to provide care for patients with limited access to subspecialists, a care gap accentuated by the geographic maldistribution of rheumatologists in the United States.Clinical trials registers form an important part of the search for studies in systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness but the search interfaces and functionality of registers can be challenging to search systematically and resource intensive to search well. We report a technical review of the search interfaces of three leading trials register resources ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registers Platform. The technical review used a validated checklist to identify areas where the search interfaces of these trials register resources performed well, where performance was adequate, where performance was poor, and to identify differences between search interfaces. The review found low overall scores for each of the interfaces (ClinicalTrials.gov 55/165, the EU Clinical Trials Register 25/165, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registers Platform 32/165). This finding suggests a need for joined-up dialogue between the producers of the registers and researchers who search them via these interfaces. We also set out a series of four proposed changes which might improve the search interfaces. Trials registers are an invaluable resource in systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness. https: