Good Herndon (reasonpine36)

Objective The relationship between the level of gambling fallacy endorsement and type of gambler (nongambler, recreational gambler, at-risk gambler, and problem/pathological gambler) was assessed both concurrently and prospectively in a large national cohort of Canadian adults. Method This cohort (n = 10,199 at baseline; 18-24 years, n = 481, 43% female; 25-34 years, n = 1,335, 62% female; 35-44 years, n = 1,543, 55% female, 45-54 years, n = 1,985, 58% female; 55-64 years, n = 2,459, 55% female; 65-74 years, n = 1,865, 44% female, 75+ years, n = 531, 43% female) was recruited from LEO, Leger Opinion's registered online panelists. The follow-up survey was completed by 55.9% of the cohort, 1 year after baseline. The full survey can be viewed at https//. For the current study, scores on the Gambling Fallacies Measure, the Problem and Pathological Gambling Measure, Gambling Participation Instrument, and Impulsivity were analyzed. Results There were three main findings. The first is that gambling fallacies are common in all categories of gamblers but somewhat more prevalent in problem and pathological gamblers. Second, the multivariate analysis determined that gambling fallacies are significant concurrent and prospective predictors of the problem/pathological gambling category, but not strong predictors relative to other variables. Third, problem gambling and heavier gambling involvement are also predictors of a future higher level of gambling fallacies. Conclusions Collectively, these results show that gambling fallacies have some etiological relationship to problem gambling but are not the main cause of problem gambling and should not be the exclusive focus of problem gambling treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Objective College is a high-risk period for the initiation and escalation of problem alcohol use. College students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at particularly high risk for experiencing alcohol-related negative consequences relative to typically developing peers. Despite this, the best therapeutic approach for addressing alcohol problems in college students with ADHD has not been identified. Behavioral activation (BA) may augment the effects of gold-standard College drinking interventions [i.e., brief motivational intervention (BMI)] for students with ADHD who are engaging in problem drinking. Method 113 college students with ADHD (Mean age = 19.87, SD = 1.44; 49.1% male) were randomized to either BMI + BA or BMI plus supportive counseling (BMI + SC). Both groups received ADHD psychoeducation delivered in MI style. Outcomes were assessed using the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire, Daily Drinking Questionnaire, Barkley Functional Impairment Scale, and Beck Depression Inventory. Results There were no significant differences in outcomes for the sample as a whole; in both conditions, participants showed significant reductions in their alcohol-related negative consequences, alcohol use, and depressive symptoms at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Exploratory moderation analyses revealed that participants with elevated depressive symptoms at baseline evidenced greater reductions in alcohol-related negative consequences in the BMI + BA condition compared to BMI + SC at the 3-month follow-up. Those low in depressive symptoms evidenced greater reductions of alcohol-related negative consequences in BMI + SC compared to BMI + BA. Conclusions For college students with ADHD who reported elevated baseline depressive symptoms, the inclusion of BA with BMI resulted in significantly greater decreases in alcohol-related negative consequences, compared to BMI + SC. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).Despite the large and growing number of studies on workplace deviance, the field currently lacks a complete understanding of who perpetrates this behavior. In one stream of research, scholars