Muir Browne (plierleek0)

This article is an extensive review that provides an update on the pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of diabetic gastroenteropathy. There is no reported prevalence, but it has been described that patients with type 1 diabetes have a cumulative incidence at 10 years of 5.2%, and type 2 patients, 1%. Also, in the group of type 1 diabetes, it has been observed that women are more likely to present this condition (5.8% vs 3.5%). Many factors are associate with its development (e.g., hyperglycemia, vagal dysfunction, loss of expression of neural nitric oxide synthase in the myenteric plexus, alterations in the Cajal interstitial cell network, and oxidative stress). Gastrointestinal discomfort could be perceived 70% higher in diabetic patients, describing that 25% of diabetic patients experience gastrointestinal symptoms. Diabetic enteropathy could affect any portion of the gastrointestinal tract, but esophageal alterations were described in more than 60% of diabetic patients, also 60% of them present constipation, and 20%, diarrhea. Gastric emptying scintigraphy is useful to evaluate gastroparesis, therefore, gastric retention of more than 60% at 2 h has a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 20% for diagnosis; however, other studies such as breath tests, with a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 80%, or the endoscopic capsule contribute to the diagnosis. There is no cure; however, management must be multidisciplinary, focused on slowing the progression of diabetic gastroenteropathy, reducing symptoms, and restoring function; that includes nutritional recommendation, maintain glucose levels kept below 180 mg/dL, use of prokinetics, anti-emetics; nowadays, it has been special interest in surgical treatment, such as pyloroplasty, also gastric electrical stimulation appears to be another alternative.The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been widely used both in clinics and in basic research for a long time. It is applied to diagnose impaired glucose tolerance and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus in individuals. Additionally, it has been employed in research to investigate glucose utilization and insulin sensitivity in animals. The main aim of each was quite different, and the details are also somewhat varied. However, the time or duration of the OGTT was the same, using the 2-h post-glucose load glycemia in both, following the suggestions of the American Diabetes Association. Recently, the use of 30-min or 1-h post-glucose load glycemia in clinical practice has been recommended by several studies. In this review article, we describe this new view and suggest perspectives for the OGTT. Additionally, quantification of the glucose curve in basic research is also discussed. Unlike in clinical practice, the incremental area under the curve is not suitable for use in the studies involving animals receiving repeated treatments or chronic treatment. We discuss the potential mechanisms in detail. Moreover, variations between bench and bedside in the application of the OGTT are introduced. Finally, the newly identified method for the OGTT must achieve a recommendation from the American Diabetes Association or another official unit soon. In conclusion, we summarize the recent reports regarding the OGTT and add some of our own perspectives, including machine learning and others.The new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed a great burden on health care systems worldwide and is an enormous and real obstacle in providing needed health care to patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes. Parallel to COVID-19, there have been great advances in technology used for management of type 1 diabetes, primarily insulin pumps, sensors, integrated and closed loop systems, ambulatory glucose profile software, and smart phone apps providing necessary essentials for telemedicine implementation right at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of these remote interventions are reassuring in terms of glycemic m