Kock Harrison (iranlake10)

The management of both-column fractures of the acetabulum is challenging for the orthopaedic surgeon. Operative treatment is usually recommended in this particular fracture pattern, as residual joint surface displacement has been shown to increase local contact stress, drastically leading to rapid cartilage destruction. In this review, we present an overview of operative steps and surgical technique for both-column acetabular fracture reconstruction. Therefore, we demonstrate how correct understanding of fracture morphology and displacement, preoperative preparation, including choice of approach and patient positioning, reduction strategies, and programmed sequential fixation, starting from superior fracture lines on the anterior acetabular column and ending on the posterior components of this fracture type, may provide satisfactory outcomes in this difficult acetabular fracture pattern.Acetabular impaction fractures when not adequately addressed leads to early arthritis. Dome impaction injuries and marginal impaction injuries have to be properly planned pre-operatively with respect to surgical approach, disimpaction techniques and fixation strategies. CT scan is the best modality to analyse the site, extent of impaction and plan strategies to reduce. Emphasis of early mobilisation should not drive the surgeon towards the motive of rigid fixation of columns alone, as the inadequate reduction of acetabular impaction leads to loss of mechanical support on weight bearing and thereby cause loss of reduction. #link# Bone grafting either by auto or allograft or graft substitutes in the void after disimpaction helps in reducing anatomically and provide mechanical support adequately. In cases of severe comminution, reconstruction of the wall defect with autologous graft is a better treatment option. In this article we reviewed the characteristics of impaction injuries of acetabulum exploring surgical procedures, approaches and techniques for achieving open reduction and internal fixation. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after pelvis fracture is suboptimal; majority of the patients do not return to their preinjury activities. Many researchers reported that late morbidity in pelvis fracture is associated with severity of the fracture, associated trauma, pelvic fracture-related complications and methods of treatment. One hundred and twelve patients with pelvis fracture who were treated either conservatively (n=88) or surgically (n=24) with a minimum of two years follow up were evaluated clinically and radiologically. The clinical outcome was evaluated using Majeed score and self-reported Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Their HRQOL was evaluated using the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) and WHOQOL-BREF questionnaires. The fracture-displacement in the anterior or posterior pelvis ring was measured from the anteroposterior radiograph or inlet/outlet view. The average Majeed score was 76.65 ± 14.73 (range, 36 to 96). There were 81 patients with displacement is within the acceptable limit. Pelvic fracture with the residual displacement of ≤ 1 cm in the sacroiliac joint/symphysis pubis result in better functional outcome and HRQOL. Injury mechanism and associated injury have no impact on the HRQOL if the residual displacement is within the acceptable limit.Pelvic ring fractures have increased in incidence and operative fixation over the past several decades. These are dynamic injuries but decisions on operative management are still often made on the basis of static imaging. Expert opinion varies greatly on which injuries require fixation and how much fixation. Examination under anaesthesia has been shown to guide management of pelvic injuries by more accurately assessing levels of instability. Venous thromboembolism is a dreaded complication leading to increased morbidity and mortality in patients having pelvi-acetabular fractures. These ev