Holme Funch (handledriver14)

81) and femoral (ICC a=0.81, b=0.87) side in the SB-group, and substantial on tibial (ICC AM=0.71, PL=0.77) and femoral (ICC AM a=0.73, b=0.78; PL a=0.74, b=0.76) side in the DB-group. Standard deviation (SD) was low (±9%) with respect to the centre of tunnel(s). Conclusion The quadrant method and the Amis and Jakob method are accurate and reproducible measurement methods. Also, as SD was low, an outside-in approach with a front-entry guide, which is free-hand positioned, can be postulated as a reliable method to locate the femoral tunnel in SB reconstruction and the AM bundle in DB reconstruction.Aim To compare a medial pivot (MP) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with posterior stabilized (PS) TKA designs from a subjective, clinical and biomechanical point of view, in a single-centre, single-surgeon, case-control non-randomized trial. Methods Sixteen patients were randomly picked up from case series into each group. Subjective outcome was assessed using the Forgotten Joint Score Questionnaire (FJSQ). Clinical evaluation included range of motion (ROM). All patients underwent gait analysis by a treadmill with force-measuring plaques and videorecording device; data were recorded for 30 seconds and included cadence, step length, stance time and walking speed. A blinded qualitative analysis of the pattern of gait was defined as biphasic or non-biphasic. Descriptive statistics for the continuous study variables and statistical significance were calculated for all parameters with independent-samples t-test and χ2 test to analyse difference in pattern of gait between groups. Results Mean FJSQ in the MP group was 91.87 (CI 95% 88.12- 95.46) and 75.31 (CI 95% 67.97-81.56) in the PS group (p=0.029). Mean post-operative ROM was 117° (CI 95% 113°-122°) in the MP group and 112° (CI 95% 108°-117°) in the PS group (p=0.14). No statistical difference was found between groups regarding all gait analysis parameters which have been recorded. Conclusion MP TKA design showed better subjective results using the FJSQ, but it did not improve significantly clinical and functional outcomes compared to PS TKA design, at a short-term follow-up.Aim To characterize methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains phenotypically and genotypically and to determine their clonal affiliation, representation and antibiotic resistance profile. Tacrine datasheet Methods A total of 62 randomly selected MRSA isolates of different clinical samples collected from 2009 to 2017 were phenotypically and genotypically analysed. Phenotypic analyses were performed by standard microbiological procedures, and using VITEK 2/AES instrument as well as MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization) technology. Genotypic characterization included spa, MLST (multilocus sequence typing) and SCCmec typing, and detection of the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) and other enterotoxin encoding genes. Results The largest number of isolates, 21 (33.87%) belonged to ST228-MRSA-I, spa type t041, t1003 and t001. Other major clones were ST239-MRSA-III, spa type t037 and t030 (27.41%); ST8-MRSA-IV, spa type t008 and t121 (12.9%); ST247-MRSA-I, spa type t051 (4.83%). PVL was detected in 10 isolates (SCCmec IV/V). During 2009 and 2010 the most frequent MRSA strain was South German clone, ST228-MRSA-I (80% and 90%, respectively), while in later years it was replaced with Brazilian-Hungarian clone ST239-MRSA-III (75% in 2015 and 2016). The South German clone, spa type t041 in 90.48% of cases was resistant to clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, cefoxitin, gentamicin, kanamycin, tobramycin and penicillin, while 70.58% samples of the Brazilian-Hungarian clone spa type t037 were additionally resistant to tetracycline and rifampicin. Conclusion This research can supplement the existing knowledge about the clonal distribution of MRSA in Bosnia and Herzegovina and their sensitivity to antibiotics in order to improve the national control of these infections.Aim A SARS Coronavirus 2 (COVID-19)