Gaines Yildirim (frenchpound32)

BACKGROUND Microwave ablation (MWA) is an important method in the treatment of liver cancer. This systematic review compared MWA with liver resection (LR) for liver cancer treatment. In recent years, the MWA has been also reported to play an important role. Studies comparing MWA and LR are lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy of MWA and LR in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to April 1, 2019 was conducted for relevant studies that compared the efficacy of MWA and LR in the treatment of HCC. The primary outcomes were local tumor recurrence (LTR) and overall survival (OS) of patients. The secondary outcomes included disease free survival (DFS), extrahepatic metastasis, intrahepatic de novo lesions, length of stay, complications, intraoperative blood loss and operative time. RESULTS A total of 16 studies including 2622 patients were identified. Incidence of LTR was significantly higher in patients with MWA than LR, with a pooled OR of 2.69 (95% CI 1.33 ‒ 5.41; P = 0.006). No significant difference in 1-year OS was found. However, patients with MWA experienced higher 3- and 5-year OS, with pooled ORs of 1.40 (95% CI 1.07 ‒ 1.84; P = 0.01) and 1.41 (95% CI 1.10 ‒ 1.80; P = 0.007) respectively. In secondary measures, the 1- and 3-year DFS were significantly higher in patients with MWA. However, no significant difference of 5-year DFS was observed. In addition, lower incidence of complications, less intraoperative blood loss and shorter operative time and shorter length of stay were observed in MWA. CONCLUSIONS Though MWA may lead to higher incidence of recurrence, it may be an effective and safe alternative in patients with HCC or liver metastases. MWA may have benefits in patients' survival and safety. check details Randomized studies should be performed to determine the target population that benefits most from MWA in the future. OBJECTIVE The optimal treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the rectum is controversial due to the extremely low incidence of the disease. The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of different treatment modalities for rectal GIST by reviewing the 14-year experience in our center. METHOD Medical records of rectal GIST patients who received surgical treatment in our center between January 2004 to December 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were used as the observation endpoints. RESULTS Included in this study were 71 GIST patients, including 42 patients who underwent local excision (LE) and 29 patients who underwent segmental resection (SR). There were differences in tumor size (P = 0.001) and malignant risk grade (P = 0.007). The LE approach achieved a lower rate of R0 resection than SR (29/42 vs.27/29, P = 0.015) and shorter hospital stay (P = 0.004). Preoperative imatinib mesylate (IM) therapy improved the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for patients with tumors in the very low segment of the rectum (P = 0.012) and offered better R0 resection margins (P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that the resection margin status (P = 0.014), risk stratification (P = 0.001) and IM therapy (P = 0.042) were independent factors affecting RFS of rectal GIST patients but not the surgical modalities (LE vs. SR, P = 0.802). Multivariate analysis showed no significant impact of these variables on OS. CONCLUSION Selection of surgical modalities has no significant impact on the prognosis. Local excision is the preferred surgical modality for resectable rectal GIST by virtue of less injury and shorter hospital stay. IM therapy has proved to be associated with improved RFS for rectal GIST patients. OBJECTIVE Hypoventilation and carbon dioxide (CO2) retention are common during sedation. The current study inve