Stanton Mosley (eastoboe9)

This study supports previous claims that actors pick up real-time information about their dynamic capabilities in order to perceive and act within their environment. Further, the study recommends that future affordance research consider trial-level movement data, including nonlinear analyses that inform the pattern and structure of motor control reliability. The Satisfaction and Recovery Index (SRI) is an importance-weighted health-related satisfaction tool intended to be a patient-centric means to capture both the process and state of recovery following musculoskeletal trauma. The purpose of this study was to explore measurement invariance, responsiveness, discriminative accuracy, and potential response shift identifiable within the SRI. Participants were 111 adults with acute musculoskeletal trauma. Data were collected at baseline, and again at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months post-injury. Other tools used were the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and a Global Rating of Change scale. 1-month test-retest reliability (ICC ), responsiveness (standardized response mean in stable vs. changed participants), discriminative accuracy (area under the curve for differentiating between recovered and non-recovered), and response shift (change in mean importance scores over the 12-month period) were explored. All but the final analysis were compared against the BPI. Test-retest reliability was excellent across all metrics (ICC =0.83 to 0.88). Responsiveness was greatest for the weighted SRI (SRM=0.36) with MDC of 13.7%. All tools showed significant ability to discriminate between participants nominating recovery vs. non-recovery (AUC≥0.69) though the BPI subscales were significantly better than the SRI. Importance ratings showed small but significant change over time in 7 of the 9 SRI items. This study provides support for the SRI as a useful tool for evaluating recovery, though it seems more valuable for capturing the process rather than state of recovery. While response shift was small, there is enough reason to endorse retention of the importance ratings. This study provides support for the SRI as a useful tool for evaluating recovery, though it seems more valuable for capturing the process rather than state of recovery. While response shift was small, there is enough reason to endorse retention of the importance ratings. The COVID-19 pandemic is exposing health workers (HW) worldwide to extreme burden and risk of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This problem emerged in Lombardy, the Italian region where the pandemic exacted the heaviest toll. Study aims were to assess mental health of HW in Lombardy after the peak of COVID-19 related hospitalizations, through the joint evaluation of PTSD and positive mental health; and to explore the potential role of positive mental health in PTSD development. HW completed an online survey including demographic and work-related information; PTSD Checklist for DSM-5; Mental Health Continuum Short-Form. Analyses comprised calculation of percentages of participants meeting a provisional PTSD and mental health diagnosis (flourishing, moderate, languishing); a binary logistic regression with demographics, work-related features, and positive mental health as predictors, and provisional PTSD diagnosis as outcome. Out of 653 participants, 39.8% received a provisional PTSD diagoth positive mental health promotion and PTSD prevention. Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) is increasingly used to decrease the deformity in breast conserving therapy (BCT) for breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate patient reported satisfaction following level II OBS and mastectomy utilizing the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Patients who underwent level II OBS BCT and those who underwent mastectomies were distributed the BREAST-Q post-reduction/mammoplasty module. Clinicopathological data were collected from review of patient c