Sutton Strickland (antforce94)

8%-100%) but varied in CO-score (range 0.00-0.14). One radiographer achieved an accuracy of 97.6% but a high CO-score of 0.14 as four reports had clinical consequence for the patients and five reports lacked minor details. One report was classified as true positive but was inadequate and led to wrong treatment. CONCLUSION This study shows that true reports can affect the patients' clinical outcome and reports classified as false can represent insignificant errors. The new CO-score gives a more nuanced view of the reporting quality by including the patients' clinical outcome in the performance score. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE We suggest that the CO-score is included as a supplement to the common methods in future studies assessing the quality of radiology reports as well as in clinical audits. INTRODUCTION Music interventions have been recognized as a method to reduce pain during medical procedures, but within medical imaging the subject has received little attention. Endorectal ultrasonography examination is in some patients associated with anxiety and pain, and since in Denmark pain relief is usually not administered by the Department of Radiology, it is important to find effective alternative methods to help patients manage their pain during imaging procedures. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of music on self-reported pain during endorectal examination of rectal cancer patients. METHODS A prospective questionnaire study of patients undergoing endorectal ultrasonography was conducted. Patients were randomized into two groups a music group (n = 66), and non-music group (n = 60). Standard endorectal ultrasonography was performed in all patients. Pain was self-assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 maximum pain. RESULTS A total of 126 patients were included in the study, 81 (64.3%) men and 45 (35.7%) women. The demographics were similar in the two groups. The mean pain score during endorectal ultrasonography in the music and non-music group was 1.95 and 2.30, (p = 0.404). CONCLUSION In this randomized study music did not significantly affect the pain level experienced by the patients. Endorectal ultrasound was not entirely painless but less painful than colonoscopy (Visual Analogue Scale 2.1 and 3.8, respectively). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Health care professionals may consider using music during painful procedures. INTRODUCTION The prevalence of obesity is rapidly increasing globally and has tripled between 1975 and 2016. Obesity is reported within the literature as having a significant impact on medical practice, professionals, imaging departments and healthcare systems. It is not known how this epidemic will impact radiation therapists' working environment and practice. The aim of this study is to explore the perceived challenges and impacts of patient obesity on radiation therapy practice from the perception of radiation therapists. METHODS All radiation therapists working in the Republic of Ireland were invited to participate. Two focus groups were conducted with 6 and 7 participants respectively. A seven staged method of analysis, using a computerised long table approach was developed and used to analyse the data and create themes related to radiation therapists' perception of managing obese patients. RESULTS Perceived challenges from the radiation therapists were difficulties; (1) Setting up the patient (2) Imaging (3) communication and emotional impact. SP600125negativecontrol CONCLUSION An array of concerns were raised during this research about the increase and impact of obese patients on radiation therapists working environment. This study suggests that obese patients can present additional challenges to radiation therapists' current work practices. It is imperative that we recognise the additional challenges this patient cohort add to daily workflow. Further research is needed to identify the common